<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ken Olsen, RIP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marknelson.us/2011/02/08/ken-olsen-rip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marknelson.us/2011/02/08/ken-olsen-rip/</link>
	<description>Programming, mostly.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 08:30:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Corley</title>
		<link>http://marknelson.us/2011/02/08/ken-olsen-rip/comment-page-1/#comment-347641</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Corley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 16:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marknelson.us/?p=297#comment-347641</guid>
		<description>Most who attended university in the 70&#039;s and &#039;80s remember the transition from IBM360/card reader to VAX/VT100. Real-time was a difficult concept to grasp for engineers who happened to use computers for projects. Submitting jobs and waiting hours for the inevitable (paper) message - unable to compile, multiple syntax errors was the norm. An interim step for me was Dartmouth&#039;s RTSS - basically dumb TTY keyboards with yellow paper for &quot;immediate&quot; output helped me make the mental transition. But it was the VAX and its golden-text VT100s that helped me better understand the relevance of interactive computing. My primary first problem with the VAX was in understanding how to get hard-copy paper output from a VT100 terminal. The concept of electronically routing output to one printer on a list of available printers was foreign to this mechanical engineer. And it took me a week to find out where the printers and their output bins were located.

Years after its first publication, I read Tracy Kidder&#039;s &quot;Soul of a New Machine&quot;. Data General and DEC were bitter loop 128 rivals in the mini-computer market in the early 70s. The story is about the personality of a DG hardware and software design team as they attempt to build a VAX/PDP-killer in the early-mid-70s. I believe that the DG-DEC battle contributed to Olsen&#039;s distraction. RIP, Ken Olsen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most who attended university in the 70&#8242;s and &#8217;80s remember the transition from IBM360/card reader to VAX/VT100. Real-time was a difficult concept to grasp for engineers who happened to use computers for projects. Submitting jobs and waiting hours for the inevitable (paper) message &#8211; unable to compile, multiple syntax errors was the norm. An interim step for me was Dartmouth&#8217;s RTSS &#8211; basically dumb TTY keyboards with yellow paper for &#8220;immediate&#8221; output helped me make the mental transition. But it was the VAX and its golden-text VT100s that helped me better understand the relevance of interactive computing. My primary first problem with the VAX was in understanding how to get hard-copy paper output from a VT100 terminal. The concept of electronically routing output to one printer on a list of available printers was foreign to this mechanical engineer. And it took me a week to find out where the printers and their output bins were located.</p>
<p>Years after its first publication, I read Tracy Kidder&#8217;s &#8220;Soul of a New Machine&#8221;. Data General and DEC were bitter loop 128 rivals in the mini-computer market in the early 70s. The story is about the personality of a DG hardware and software design team as they attempt to build a VAX/PDP-killer in the early-mid-70s. I believe that the DG-DEC battle contributed to Olsen&#8217;s distraction. RIP, Ken Olsen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

