<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel&#8217;s JPEG Library</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marknelson.us/2002/07/01/intels-jpeg-library/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marknelson.us/2002/07/01/intels-jpeg-library/</link>
	<description>Programming, mostly.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:05:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: obfuscated</title>
		<link>http://marknelson.us/2002/07/01/intels-jpeg-library/comment-page-1/#comment-322347</link>
		<dc:creator>obfuscated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 04:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/2002/07/01/intels-jpeg-library/#comment-322347</guid>
		<description>anyone knows how this compares to gdiplus on windows xp? beacuse gdi+  on win7 seems to be extremly fast in encoding/decoding jpeg images (encoding 100 images in </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anyone knows how this compares to gdiplus on windows xp? beacuse gdi+  on win7 seems to be extremly fast in encoding/decoding jpeg images (encoding 100 images in</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cordel</title>
		<link>http://marknelson.us/2002/07/01/intels-jpeg-library/comment-page-1/#comment-318761</link>
		<dc:creator>cordel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/2002/07/01/intels-jpeg-library/#comment-318761</guid>
		<description>Well, it is a bit unclear.

VS 2008 MSDN says that OleLoadPicturePath was available on Win95 and WinNT 4, but MSFN Online states that minimum supported system is Win2000.

Checking the export list of Win95&amp;NT olepro32.dll would solve the puzzle, but I don&#039;t have any old system handy. I think it is 
more likely that you are right and VS 2008 MSDN is wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it is a bit unclear.</p>
<p>VS 2008 MSDN says that OleLoadPicturePath was available on Win95 and WinNT 4, but MSFN Online states that minimum supported system is Win2000.</p>
<p>Checking the export list of Win95&amp;NT olepro32.dll would solve the puzzle, but I don&#8217;t have any old system handy. I think it is<br />
more likely that you are right and VS 2008 MSDN is wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Nelson</title>
		<link>http://marknelson.us/2002/07/01/intels-jpeg-library/comment-page-1/#comment-318700</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/2002/07/01/intels-jpeg-library/#comment-318700</guid>
		<description>@cordel:

I don&#039;t believe OleLoadPicturePath was available for Windows XP or Windows 95 at the time this article was written. It&#039;s hard to tell for sure though, so I could be wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@cordel:</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe OleLoadPicturePath was available for Windows XP or Windows 95 at the time this article was written. It&#8217;s hard to tell for sure though, so I could be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cordel</title>
		<link>http://marknelson.us/2002/07/01/intels-jpeg-library/comment-page-1/#comment-318692</link>
		<dc:creator>cordel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/2002/07/01/intels-jpeg-library/#comment-318692</guid>
		<description>&quot;Microsoft makes reading easier with the simple OleLoadPicture function, but loses points for not reading from standard files&quot;

Not quite true, MS provides OleLoadPicturePath function for reading from file/URL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Microsoft makes reading easier with the simple OleLoadPicture function, but loses points for not reading from standard files&#8221;</p>
<p>Not quite true, MS provides OleLoadPicturePath function for reading from file/URL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://marknelson.us/2002/07/01/intels-jpeg-library/comment-page-1/#comment-30902</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 22:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/2002/07/01/intels-jpeg-library/#comment-30902</guid>
		<description>noted and corrected, linuxhippy, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>noted and corrected, linuxhippy, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linuxhippy</title>
		<link>http://marknelson.us/2002/07/01/intels-jpeg-library/comment-page-1/#comment-30889</link>
		<dc:creator>Linuxhippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/2002/07/01/intels-jpeg-library/#comment-30889</guid>
		<description>MMX came with Pentium-MMX, not with the i486!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MMX came with Pentium-MMX, not with the i486!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://marknelson.us/2002/07/01/intels-jpeg-library/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 16:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/2002/07/01/intels-jpeg-library/#comment-189</guid>
		<description>i still think it&#039;s a shame that they charge $199 for this library, but it is probably well worth the money to anyone who needs it, particularly for commercial products.

I noticed on Intel&#039;s web site that you can get academic pricing on the library, which brings the price down to $50, but unfortunately that is available to faculty only, and they make it pretty tough to cheat by requiring a school purchase order. :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i still think it&#8217;s a shame that they charge $199 for this library, but it is probably well worth the money to anyone who needs it, particularly for commercial products.</p>
<p>I noticed on Intel&#8217;s web site that you can get academic pricing on the library, which brings the price down to $50, but unfortunately that is available to faculty only, and they make it pretty tough to cheat by requiring a school purchase order. :-(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: commandor</title>
		<link>http://marknelson.us/2002/07/01/intels-jpeg-library/comment-page-1/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>commandor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 16:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/2002/07/01/intels-jpeg-library/#comment-188</guid>
		<description>Regarding the IJG library, they now provide patched version of IJG&#039;s sources in their IPP JPEG sample. This code is faster than original IJG but not so fast as Intel JPEG codec.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the IJG library, they now provide patched version of IJG&#8217;s sources in their IPP JPEG sample. This code is faster than original IJG but not so fast as Intel JPEG codec.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

